prop
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3336,6 +3336,9 @@ Perhaps if we can relax the definition of liftable by allowing $g$ to be a relat
|
|||||||
\todo{Write it down. You have it in your notes.}
|
\todo{Write it down. You have it in your notes.}
|
||||||
\end{proof}
|
\end{proof}
|
||||||
\todo{Try $FX=\powf(X^2)$ to see if the symmetrization of its lax Barr relator is a Barr relator. The order is just the set inclusion. See if~\autoref{prop:lax-relator-full-comm} or~\autoref{lem:lax-relator-str} can help!}
|
\todo{Try $FX=\powf(X^2)$ to see if the symmetrization of its lax Barr relator is a Barr relator. The order is just the set inclusion. See if~\autoref{prop:lax-relator-full-comm} or~\autoref{lem:lax-relator-str} can help!}
|
||||||
|
\begin{prop}
|
||||||
|
Assuming that $r$ is a symmetric relation, and it is an $\relar$-simulation on a coalgebra $(X,\alpha)$, then $r$ is a $\hat{\relar}$-bisimulation.
|
||||||
|
\end{prop}
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user